The failing kidney loses control of the body's chemistry, and two disturbances in particular are both common and actionable: metabolic acidosis and hyperkalaemia. Each is more than a number on a panel. Acidosis quietly erodes bone and muscle and may hasten the kidney's own decline; hyperkalaemia is the side effect that most often drives clinicians to abandon the very drugs that protect the kidney. Managing both well is less about chasing values than about protecting the patient and preserving the therapies of Part 2.
Why acidosis develops, and why it matters
The kidney's job in acid-base balance is to excrete the daily acid load, largely by generating ammonia in the tubule. As nephrons are lost, ammoniagenesis and acid excretion fall, and acid accumulates — a metabolic acidosis that begins as a normal-anion-gap picture and, in advanced CKD, acquires a high anion gap as retained anions build up. The reason to treat it is that acidosis is not inert. The body buffers the retained acid in bone, demineralising it and worsening the mineral-bone disorder of the last chapter. It drives muscle protein catabolism, contributing to the protein-energy wasting that harms CKD patients. It aggravates hyperkalaemia by shifting potassium out of cells. And it appears to accelerate CKD progression itself, acting as one of the amplifiers of Chapter 2 through ammonia-mediated and hormonal tubular injury. So correcting acidosis is, simultaneously, a bone, muscle, potassium, and progression intervention.
Treating acidosis with bicarbonate
The mainstay is oral sodium bicarbonate, titrated to keep the serum bicarbonate at or above about 22 mmol/L. The aim is correction, not over-correction: pushing bicarbonate above the normal range courts a metabolic alkalosis and, because bicarbonate is a sodium salt, adds a sodium and volume load that can worsen blood pressure, so the target is the lower-normal range rather than the highest achievable. The evidence is genuinely mixed. Some trials — including an influential one — found that correcting acidosis slowed CKD progression and preserved nutritional status, while others, particularly in older patients, were neutral on the outcomes they measured. The honest reading is that bicarbonate is plausibly progression-slowing and clearly corrects a harmful metabolic state, but the magnitude of the progression benefit is uncertain. A base-rich, plant-dominant diet, which lowers the dietary acid load, is a complementary and increasingly favoured approach, and newer acid-binding agents are under investigation. Correct the acidosis; do not over-correct it.
Why hyperkalaemia is the pillar-limiting problem
Potassium excretion depends on functioning nephrons and on aldosterone, both compromised in CKD, so hyperkalaemia is common and becomes more so as the GFR falls. Several factors stack on top: the RAAS blockade and finerenone of Part 2 reduce aldosterone-driven potassium excretion and raise potassium; acidosis shifts potassium out of cells; constipation reduces the colonic excretion that becomes important in CKD; and a high-potassium diet adds load. The clinical importance is specific. Severe hyperkalaemia with ECG changes is an acute emergency managed with the standard measures — calcium to stabilise the membrane, insulin-glucose and other shifts, and removal — covered with the electrolyte emergencies elsewhere. But the CKD-defining problem is chronic hyperkalaemia, and its significance is that it is the commonest reason clinicians stop RAAS blockade and finerenone, forfeiting the kidney and cardiovascular protection those drugs provide. Managing chronic hyperkalaemia is, in large part, about keeping patients on the pillars.
Managing chronic hyperkalaemia
The chronic-management toolkit is built to enable, not abandon, the protective drugs. Dietary potassium is restricted thoughtfully — mindful of the potassium paradox of Chapter 6, where a healthy plant-rich diet is potassium-rich but beneficial, so blanket restriction is avoided. Acidosis is corrected, which itself lowers potassium. Diuretics enhance renal potassium excretion. Constipation is treated. And the modern potassium binders — patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate — bind potassium in the gut and have transformed chronic management by allowing RAAS blockade and finerenone to be continued at effective doses rather than withdrawn. The older binder, sodium polystyrene sulfonate, is best avoided where the modern agents are available, given concern about gastrointestinal injury including bowel necrosis. The governing principle, carried from the RAAS chapter, is to manage the potassium so the drug can stay, reserving discontinuation for hyperkalaemia that genuinely cannot be controlled.
Magnesium, urate, and the other electrolytes
Two further electrolyte issues deserve brief, specific attention. Magnesium is excreted by the kidney, so as the GFR falls magnesium accumulates, and the practical lesson is to avoid magnesium-containing laxatives and antacids in advanced CKD, which can precipitate dangerous hypermagnesaemia. Hyperuricaemia is common in CKD and tempts clinicians to treat it for renoprotection, but the trials of urate-lowering therapy in CKD did not show a slowing of progression — so urate-lowering is indicated for symptomatic gout, which is genuinely more frequent in CKD, but not for asymptomatic hyperuricaemia in the hope of protecting the kidney. The other disturbances — sodium and water handling, phosphate (the subject of the mineral-bone chapter) — are managed in their own contexts; the CKD-specific, high-yield actions of this chapter are correcting acidosis and managing potassium.
Where the evidence is firm, and where it is mixed
The firm parts are mechanistic and practical: that acidosis harms bone, muscle, and potassium balance, that potassium binders enable continuation of RAAS blockade, and that urate-lowering does not slow CKD progression are all well supported, the last by dedicated randomised trials. The mixed part is the progression benefit of bicarbonate — promising in some trials, neutral in others — so it is treated as a reasonable, low-risk intervention that corrects a harmful state, rather than a proven disease-modifier on the level of the Part-2 pillars. The disciplined approach is to correct acidosis without over-correcting, to use binders to keep patients on their protective drugs, to avoid magnesium loading, and to spare patients urate-lowering therapy given for the wrong reason.